Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(392)
-
▼
August
(43)
- FTC and Trudeau split decision
- FTC loses substantiation case because of good faith
- Recent reading: piracy as creativity
- Being good in business is the most fascinating kin...
- Scariest headline I've seen in a while.
- Best Twilight-related merchandise ever.
- LaunchCast victory affirmed
- Litigation privileges and false advertising
- Game, set, affirmance
- Where are all the men bloggers?
- Ambusch marketing
- Fair use warning
- iPhone apps: cash cow or anticommons?
- "All natural" case not at all preempted
- Lanham Act doesn't cover competition with customers
- Trade name infringement as false advertising
- First Amendment fails to justify dismissing false ...
- When is descriptive use not descriptive?
- Crazylegs
- Transformertive use
- What sweetens a legend most?
- Long-delayed Facenda post
- Extraterritoriality: Lanham Act applies to German ...
- FDA preemption argument loses again
- Seen around towns
- Too much in the sun: Neutrogena v. Coppertone
- Fortune favors the bold
- Hoist on its own potassium: Gatorade loses to Powe...
- Conference announcement: Google Book Search
- IPSC: final plenary
- IPSC: daily double--theory
- IPSC: Copyright/Right of Publicity/GIs
- IPSC: Trademark
- IPSC: Mixed IP
- IPSC: Copyright
- Bonus post: Arlington, the Rap
- IPSC: trademark and the consumer
- IPSC, first plenary session
- Release bars false advertising and other claims
- Amicus brief in Salinger
- Fair and balanced: battle of the credit giants
- Revitalizing false patent marking
- Snow job: new article on false advertising at ski ...
-
▼
August
(43)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (538)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (278)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (273)
- conferences (930)
- consumer protection (976)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (101)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1664)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (161)
- dastar (197)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (258)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3146)
- false association (13)
- false designation of origin (8)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (276)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (445)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (44)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (73)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (137)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (226)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (271)
- presentations (119)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (146)
- property (18)
- reading list (311)
- remedies (283)
- right of publicity (267)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (358)
- surveys (113)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2072)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
There is a very similar warning at the beginning of A Fair(y) Use Tale, complete with FBI trade dress. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo
Post a Comment